Infant Social Security Numbers Are Easy Targets For Identity Thieves

  x You have successfully emailed the post.

Adora McLemore was stunned  when her one-year-old daughter was denied financial assistance for medical care.

Health administrators apologized but explained the infant's income was too great -- there was no way they could approve her.

Finally, she found a caseworker to clear her daughter's file and recently said to Market Watch, "How could she be earning income when she was only one?"

For seven years McLemore worked with the Social Security Administration (SSA) and police trying to understand the fraud, getting no closer to the truth. Eventually, she went to an identity monitoring service and found her daughter was responsible for $39,000 in debt and multiple credit cards in various names.

"Children’s identities are attractive because they are pristine," Steven Toporoff, attorney at the Federal Trade Commission told Market Watch. “There’s no good credit or bad credit attached to a child’s name.”

Read more at Market Watch >

Please follow Business Insider on Twitter and Facebook.
Follow Robert Johnson on Twitter.
Ask Robert A Question >

x

To embed this post, copy the code below and paste into your website or blog.

View the original article here

This post was made using the Auto Blogging Software from WebMagnates.org This line will not appear when posts are made after activating the software to full version.

Google+ Isn't Just A Social Network, It's An "Identity Service" (GOOG)

  x You have successfully emailed the post.

Google+ is not just the search giant's effort to take on Facebook: it's primarily an "identity service" that Google will use to help build other services.

That's according to Google chairman Eric Schmidt, who was explaining why Google+ is requiring users to stick with their real names.

As Fred Wilson points out, Schimdt's statement raises the question of who Google+ is really for -- you, or Google?

Lots of companies have tried to establish an identity system for the Web. The idea is that if users have a single trusted identity, it could ease their interactions offline and online -- imagine never having to sign in to get your email or make an online purchase, for instance. Microsoft made an effort in the late 1990s with Passport, but its ambitions were thwarted by privacy advocates and the FTC. Facebook's social graph is another effort.

Before Google+, your Google identity was really only used on Google sites. But with Google+ and the +1 button, that identity system can extend across the Web -- if you're signed in to Google+ and you +1 a particular Web site, that information can be tracked. That helps Google provide more personalized services (like search results) for you, but could also help with ad targeting.

Schmidt also said that Google believes the Internet will work better if people know that you're a real person rather than a fake person or a dog.

Andy Carvin asked the question, then paraphrased Schimdt's answer on -- of course -- a Google+ post.

Please follow SAI on Twitter and Facebook.
Follow Matt Rosoff on Twitter.
Ask Matt A Question >

x

To embed this post, copy the code below and paste into your website or blog.

View the original article here

This post was made using the Auto Blogging Software from WebMagnates.org This line will not appear when posts are made after activating the software to full version.