Showing posts with label America. Show all posts
Showing posts with label America. Show all posts

Sunday, February 5, 2012

Here Are The 10 Most Expensive Places To Give Birth In America

Reija Eden delivered each of her three children without requiring cesarean sections, pain medications or an epidural.

The 34-year-old mother from Huntington Beach, Calif who owns Reija Eden Jewelry paid about $5,000 for each of her children's births out of pocket, after insurance.

"With pain medication, the costs would have been a lot higher, so luckily I didn't need them, nor did I need a C-section," Eden says.

The cost of having a baby delivered at a hospital can vary wildly depending on how the birth goes. If mothers want an epidural, the hospitals will charge for the medication and for the cost of an anesthesiologist to come to administer it. C-sections are considered major surgery, and costs significantly more than a vaginal delivery.

According to the most recent data provided by the U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services, the average cost of delivering a baby vaginally was $9,617 in the U.S. in 2009, and $15,799 for babies delivered via C-section.

The costs also vary greatly depending on the hospital and state. To determine our state-rankings of the most expensive places to have a baby, we went through the most recent data provided by the U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services and looked at average hospital charges for vaginal and cesarean deliveries.

There was only data available for 35 states, but the sample was large enough for us to see how the cost of having a baby can differ depending on where you live. You can see more about the methodology and the list of states included here.

New Jersey is the most expensive state to have a baby. The average hospital charge for a vaginal delivery in New Jersey is $18,372 — 91 percent higher than the national average. The average C-section in New Jersey costs $26,743, 69 percent higher than the national average.

Of the 35 states we looked at, California ranks second as the most expensive ($14,523 for the average vaginal delivery, $24,777 for C-section), and Florida ranks third ($10,435 for the average vaginal delivery, $18,574 for C-section). At the bottom of the list: Maryland. Hospitals in Maryland charge an average of $5,509 for vaginal deliveries and $6,812 for C-sections — well below the national averages.

Of course, if you have insurance, you won't have to pay these huge sums, and even people without insurance can see discounts on their hospital bills.

"I had a great HMO plan," says Monica Brady, a mother of twins who runs the site Mommy Brain Reports. "My OB vistas and the delivery were 100 percent covered, and I didn't have a co-pay for any of it. My girls were both delivered via C-section, so we were very lucky."

Although parents may not be able to control what hospitals will charge them to deliver their baby, they can control what it costs to have a baby once their little one is home.

"I wanted to keep the costs down by shopping at IKEA for baby furniture, while spending more for items such as a hospital grade breast pump and high quality high chair," Eden says. "The breast pump cost about $500 and the high chair was about $150. Both items lasted to three children so I consider money well spent there.

Since I breastfed all my children, I didn't have to spend money on formula. I chose to spend more money on natural diapers though, and only bought Seventh Generation diapers for our babies. I also spent more money on high quality organic baby food and other organic baby items such as toys, cleaning supplies and laundry detergent to ensure that our children wouldn't be exposed to chemicals at such a young age."

Jessica Katz, who runs the blog Mommy Don't Buy That, says it's perfectly okay to buy used. She suggests buying new car seats, but used strollers, doing toy and clothes trades with friends, and shopping at consignment stores.

"I know you want to dress your kid like a doll, but they outgrow so fast, so find sales," Katz says.

"Buy early," Brady says. "I love finding clothing on clearance. Usually, I'll find the previous season's fashions on clearance, and I'll buy them up a size or two bigger than what my girls wear now. By the time next year rolls around, they're taller and I don't have to make any last minute dashes out to buy a new coat at full price. Also, search around and you'll find a lot of free samples through diaper companies, infant formula companies, and more. Don't hesitate to call [companies'] customer service lines to ask."

This post originally appeared at Bundle.


View the original article here


This post was made using the Auto Blogging Software from WebMagnates.org This line will not appear when posts are made after activating the software to full version.

Thursday, September 22, 2011

The Most Miserable Cities In America

  x You have successfully emailed the post. Combine high unemployment, a stagnant economy and basement-level housing prices, and what have you got?

The most miserable cities in America, according to Brookings, of course! The think tank combined every major U.S. city's unemployment rate, level of employment, gross metropolitan product and housing prices to create an index of utter wretchedness.

Nationwide economic progress in the second quarter was "uneven and unsure" and some by measures we're back in recession. The worst cities are clustered in former housing bubble areas like Florida and California.

Please follow Money Game on Twitter and Facebook.
Follow Gus Lubin on Twitter.
Ask Gus A Question >

x

To embed this post, copy the code below and paste into your website or blog.


View the original article here


This post was made using the Auto Blogging Software from WebMagnates.org This line will not appear when posts are made after activating the software to full version.

THE SAD STATE OF WORK IN AMERICA: The Young Sit Idle, The Elderly Work Forever

  x You have successfully emailed the post. chartGuess which one of these two is working

The US Census Bureau released fresh data today, including some grim charts that put our depressing labor situation in perspective.

Here's the takeaway: The labor force has stagnated. If you haven't lost your job you'll probably keep working for long past retirement. If you're young and don't have job (nor work experience) you won't be finding one for a long time.

We have a few details on this troubling situation.

Please follow Money Game on Twitter and Facebook.
Follow Linette Lopez on Twitter.
Ask Linette A Question >

x

To embed this post, copy the code below and paste into your website or blog.


View the original article here


This post was made using the Auto Blogging Software from WebMagnates.org This line will not appear when posts are made after activating the software to full version.

Thursday, September 15, 2011

The Census Department Just Released Some Shameful New Data About Poverty In America

  x You have successfully emailed the post. The Census Bureau data is out on 2010, and it confirmed the recession's deep impact on Americans.

From the report: Household income dropped under $50,000 since 2009 to $49,44546.2 million people were under poverty in 2010, up from 43.6 million in 2009That's the largest number of people under poverty since 1959The nation's official poverty rate in 2010 jumped to 15.1 percent, up from 14.3 percent in 2009

The numbers go much further, telling a difficult story for many black and Hispanic Americans, who were some of the hardest impacted in 2010.

Please follow Money Game on Twitter and Facebook.
Follow Eric Platt on Twitter.
Ask Eric A Question >

x

To embed this post, copy the code below and paste into your website or blog.


View the original article here


This post was made using the Auto Blogging Software from WebMagnates.org This line will not appear when posts are made after activating the software to full version.

Monday, September 12, 2011

Thursday, September 8, 2011

Bank Of America Just Became A Totally Different Beast. Check Out All The Changes (BAC)

Up to 600 branches could close in Bank of America's split into two separate consumer and commercial units, according to CNN.

But that's not the only change apparent at the bank. The restructuring could also cut 30,000 jobs, 10.5% of the bank's employees.

Reports of possible closings and layoffs come on the tail of a major management shakeup that was necessary in order to divide Merrill in half.

Merrill's wealth management division (brokers) will now be part of Bank of America's gigantic consumer division and report to David Darnell. Merrill's institutional investment banking and trading division will now report to Tom Montag. This seems tantamount to cutting the firm in half.

The re-org also saw the departure of Sallie Krawcheck and Joe Price, two top officials and the creation of two COO positions where there was none.

The two new COO's will be Tom Montag and David Darnell. 

David Darnell will be overseeing the bank's retail brokerage and consumer units. He started as a credit analyst for the company in 1979. Since then, he's served as executive VP and Commercial Division executive for the bank in Florida, headed consumer and commercial operations in the central U.S., led the bank's Middle Market Banking Group (for four years), and headed a team that took care of all bank services in one in three mid-sized business across the country.

According to Forbes, it's Merrill's old brokers who could be feeling the most sore about Darnell's appointment. Sallie Krawcheck was their advocate at the top, and now they're afraid Darnell will continue to try to change their culture or compensation. To the former he has said little to assuage their fears. To the latter, according to the NYPost, he has already made moves to ensure bankers that their compensation structure would remain untouched.

Tom Montag is responsible for all of the businesses that serve companies and institutional investors. Before that, he was president of Global Banking and Markets at Bank of America Merrill Lynch. He joined Merrill in 2008, before its merger with Bank of America.

And before that he was at Goldman Sachs for 22 years, where he held a number of executive positions, including co-head of Asian FICC and Equities and the bank's global securities business. All of that boils down to one e-mail, though -- an e-mail read during a Senate committee hearing where he discussed  "one shitty deal" the bank made on CDO Timberwolf.


View the original article here


This post was made using the Auto Blogging Software from WebMagnates.org This line will not appear when posts are made after activating the software to full version.

Interview: An Update On Small Business Hiring In America

President Obama has received a lot of flak for failing to create jobs. He is expected to pitch a national job training program during his big jobs speech tomorrow. 

Meanwhile, small businesses credited with creating 58,000 of the 91,000 new private sector jobs in August are struggling to get government funding. 

Year-to-date hiring by small businesses is down 2.6%, while paycheck's have declined 0.3%, according to SurePayRoll's 2011 small business scorecard. The survey which collects data from 32,000 customers and looks at the smallest businesses across 35 cities, found that cities like St. Louis bucked the trend. We spoke with Michael Alter CEO of SurePayRoll about his findings and what he expects for small businesses in the coming year.

BI: Based on the scorecard, what are individual cities doing right or wrong?

A lot of these are very local. Our data includes small businesses and contractors. In cities where you see growth, contractors are higher and are doing more to create jobs. In St. Louis we've seem month-over-month and year-over-year growth which is a good sign but small businesses aren't sure whether they should be hiring full time employees because they are getting new orders, so you see them take on contractors but the paychecks may go down. 

There are 5 stages really first small businesses reduce work hours, then they layoff workers and both indices go negative. Then they come back and increase work hours and overtime, then they start to bring in contractors and finally start hiring permanent employees again. 

The challenge is we've been hovering from the bad stage to stage 3 and aren't moving up from there. 

BI: Do you think the burden to help small businesses should fall on the federal or state/local governments? 

The burden should really be on all of them. Small business owners are not discerning on where they get the funding, they just want access to it. We survey small business owners on economic prospects. Now, only 1 in 2 is optimistic i.e. 1 in 2 in pessimistic, and 2 in 2 has given up belief in any government help. One of the small business owners we have said "I choose to be optimistic about the future, not clueless". There is a lot uncertainty about what the government might or might not do. 

BI: Small businesses are adding more jobs than big firms but even they have been cutting down on jobs. Do you see a similar trend in the future?

I expect to see reduction in hiring. The ADP report overstates larger companies and understates smaller companies. Until optimism picks up I see this trend continuing. If a business owner is optimistic he may add a second delivery truck, if he is pessimistic he won't because he doesn't want people hunkering him down. 

BI: What do you expect from President Obama's job speech on Thursday?

Government programs that provide short-term and long-term funding and reduce paperwork and allow more Small Business Administration (SBA), quicker. Maybe a reduction in corporate tax rate. I would like to see an infrastructure bank set-up for small businesses. Coming out of past recessions, small businesses have got us out of it. Earlier SB owners could max-out their credit cards, 401K, borrow from friends and family. Now banks are cutting down on credit, gyrations in the stock market affecting 401K there isn't much to borrow and getting a second mortgage on a home is pretty tough. These ways of bootstrapping aren't there anymore and the government needs to step in.

BI: Additional thoughts?

If you look forward we continue to bounce at the bottom. The challenge is that small business productivity has been growing at a rate greater than their revenues. Thus, others are more stable because a number of existing businesses are able to increase their revenues without adding additional employees (revenue growth at lower cost). But that doesn't put us back to work.


View the original article here


This post was made using the Auto Blogging Software from WebMagnates.org This line will not appear when posts are made after activating the software to full version.

Tuesday, September 6, 2011

Charting The Incredible Shift From Manufacturing To Services In America

  x You have successfully emailed the post. Doug Short is the vice president of research at Advisor Perspectives.

In honor of Labor Day, which was signed into law as a national holiday in 1894, I spent some time this morning studying a topic I've occasionally mentioned: The shift in the United States from a manufacturing to a services economy.

 The Department of Labor's Bureau of Labor Statistics has monthly data on employment by industry categories reaching back to 1939. The first chart below is an overlay of the compete series of employment numbers for the two major categories, manufacturing and services.

When I say major, I'm referring to the complete domination of the labor market by these two industries. To illustrate this fact, I've also included the total of the two categories and a dotted line showing total nonfarm employment.

chart

In 1939 service industries employed more people than manufacturing by a ratio of 2.1-to-1.0. But that ratio was soon to change. For a clearer picture of the relative growth of manufacturing and services, the next chart illustrates just that: The cumulative growth of the two series, along with total nonfarm employment.

chart

During WWII, manufacturing employment rose dramatically, but it began returning to its pre-war pattern after the war ended. Thereafter, manufacturing employment has had a complex history with a peak in the late 1970s and a secular decline thereafter. Here are some observations about manufacturing and services over the past seven plus decades:

Manufacturing is far more sensitive to the business cycle. Compare, for example, the relative behavior of manufacturing and services relative to the recession bars. Growth in services began accelerating in the 1960s and accelerated again after the double-dip recession in the early 1980. Manufacturing accelerated at a slower pace in the 1960s and then oscillated around a flat line in sync with the four recessions from 1970 to 1982. Manufacturing employment peaked in June 1979. It never recovered from the double dip recession of 1980-1982. The spring of 1998 was the an interim high for manufacturing jobs, but with the recession of 2001 began a 35% decline in jobs from the 1998 peak to the trough (so far) in December 2009. Manufacturing has essentially flatlined over the past 21 months.

Services industry employment began leveling off with the onset of the 2001 recession. Growth began accelerating again in 2004, but the rate of growth was well below what we saw in the 1980s and 1990s. Services employment hit its all-time peak in January 2008, the second month of the Great Recession. Services employment is slowly improving, but it remains about 2.6% below the 2008 peak.

Please follow Money Game on Twitter and Facebook.

x

To embed this post, copy the code below and paste into your website or blog.


View the original article here


This post was made using the Auto Blogging Software from WebMagnates.org This line will not appear when posts are made after activating the software to full version.

HAPPY LABOR DAY: Now Here's The Real State Of The Job Market In America

  x You have successfully emailed the post. It's Labor Day!

As many have noted, it's a grim time to be celebrating the American workers, who continue to have it as bad as ever.

To give you a snapshot of the situation, we've culled 7 key charts (via the St. Louis Fed) that really show how bad things are. They all come from the latest Non-Farm Payrolls report released last Friday.

Please follow Money Game on Twitter and Facebook.
Follow Joe Weisenthal on Twitter.
Ask Joe A Question >

x

To embed this post, copy the code below and paste into your website or blog.


View the original article here


This post was made using the Auto Blogging Software from WebMagnates.org This line will not appear when posts are made after activating the software to full version.

Saturday, September 3, 2011

19 Scary Facts About Getting A Job In America

  x You have successfully emailed the post. Judging by the September 2 jobs report, a double dip recession is closer than ever before and that's bad news for everyone still looking for a job.

Even worse than the modest 68,000 jobs analysts expected to see, no new jobs at all were added to the economy this quarter.

Manufacturing shrank by another 3% and unemployment remained a stark 9.1%.

Even the wages for those fortunate enough to be working went down by 0.1%—not a good sign.

As bad as this is there are jobs out there, just be prepared to go up against terrifying odds.

Please follow Money Game on Twitter and Facebook.
Follow Gus Lubin on Twitter.
Ask Gus A Question >

x

To embed this post, copy the code below and paste into your website or blog.


View the original article here


This post was made using the Auto Blogging Software from WebMagnates.org This line will not appear when posts are made after activating the software to full version.

Guess Which City Has The Worst Drivers In America

There are plenty of good things about our nation's capital, but driving skills are not one of them.

Washington, DC again came in dead last on Allstate's annual list of the 193 safest driving cities in America (via Jalopnik).

According to the insurance company, drivers in the city go an average of 4.8 years between accidents.

That's pretty frequent when you consider that in the safest driving city, Fort Collins, Colo., drivers have accidents every 14 years, on average.

And drivers in DC are more than twice as likely to get in a wreck than the national average rate.

Props to drivers in Fort Collins; Boise, Idaho; Lincoln, Neb.; Chandler, Ariz. and Huntsville, Ala., whose hometowns were ranked the safest.

Phoenix was the safest city with a population over 1 million.

And to drivers in DC; Baltimore; Glendale, Calif.; Newark; and Providence, RI, which ranked at the bottom of the list, please, keep an eye on the road this Labor Day weekend.


View the original article here


This post was made using the Auto Blogging Software from WebMagnates.org This line will not appear when posts are made after activating the software to full version.

The Most Brutal Layoffs Yet: Bank Of America Could Slash Up To 30,000 Jobs (BAC)

BofA layoffsBank of America might lay off up to 30,000 people in the coming years, according to a report in the Charlotte Observer.

That means it could cut over 10% of its 288,000 employees worldwide, making BofA the bank with the most brutal layoff plans we've heard yet, second only to HSBC's plans to layoff 30,000 of its 300,000 strong workforce. 

Sources familiar with the firm announced the mass layoffs soon after the FHFA filed a huge lawsuit against Bank of America over $30.85 billion in losses on mortgage securities.*

The unfinalized plans are to cut over 10,000 and up to 30,000 employees in the next few years.

The reason for them is simple.

The massive cuts are partly to make up for what are expected to be huge lawsuit-related losses over the firm's and Countrywide's role in the mortgage crisis. Bank of America bought Countrywide, the country's largest mortgage lender, in 2008.

Also, it needs to downsize anyway. JPMorgan is more profitable and has around 38,000 fewer employees.

This is just one of many of Bank of America's efforts to cut costs and shore up capital in advance of the 2013 capital requirements mandated by Basel III.

*(BofA isn't alone. The FHFA announced similar lawsuits against nearly every one of the U.S. bulge bracket banks, all of which are named here.)

Wall Street layoffs to hit en masse this fall >


View the original article here


This post was made using the Auto Blogging Software from WebMagnates.org This line will not appear when posts are made after activating the software to full version.

Thursday, August 25, 2011

9 Hedge Fund Managers Who Could Make Millions On Bank Of America (BAC)

  x You have successfully emailed the post.

larry-robbinsGlenview's Larry Robbins

These 9 hedge fund managers, some of the biggest Bank of America shareholders, just got a bit of a double-edged reward.

They've made millions this morning, after shares of Bank of America have been on the rise ever since Warren Buffett announced that he's investing $5 billion in the firm. But the deal could end up stinging shareholders a bit if Buffett exercises the option to buy 700 million shares, an option he now has as part of the deal.

There's another thing to remember too.

Most Bank of America investors lost a lot of money in Bank of America this year. The stock has been down 50% recently since the beginning of the year.

However one look at how Goldman Sachs' stock performed after Buffett's similar "good faith" investment in the company shows that its likely they will earn much if not all of their investment back and more, depending on when they bought in. Buffett invested in Goldman in September 2008. The stock jumped 14% in the four days after the investment, then it fell 62% though mid-November, according to WSJ.  It later rallied 270% from mid-November to October 2009.

The point is, these 9 hedge fund managers stuck with Bank of America, and it looks like it's starting to pay off.

Congrats, guys! 

Please follow Clusterstock on Twitter and Facebook.
Follow Courtney Comstock on Twitter.
Ask Courtney A Question >

x

To embed this post, copy the code below and paste into your website or blog.


View the original article here


This post was made using the Auto Blogging Software from WebMagnates.org This line will not appear when posts are made after activating the software to full version.

Analyst Shares 4 Reasons Why Citigroup Is Better Than Bank of America

  x You have successfully emailed the post.

Citigroup(C_) and Bank of America(BAC_) have both been pummeled equally in the stock market in the past month, but analysts say Citigroup is the better opportunity.

Last week, UBS analyst William Tanona said the stock of Citigroup deserved a premium over Bank of America as it faces "less dramatic uncertainties" from large, mortgage-related liabilities and stronger earnings power.

On Wednesday, Glenn Schorr at Nomura released a report, making similar arguments. While the analyst thinks the selloff in both the stocks are overdone, he still prefers Citigroup and JPMorgan Chase(JPM_) over Bank of America. "..given similar valuations, we think Citi is the more attractive opportunity, based on its edge in capital, reserves, exposure to the growth markets and smaller mortgage-related risks. We also see attractive value in JPM at 1.0x tangible book."

Schorr lists four reasons why Citigroup is not Bank of America.

First, Citi is better capitalized. The analyst estimates that Citi's Basel III Tier 1 Common Ratio at the end of the second quarter was at 6.7% versus 5.1% for Bank of America.Citi also has less mortgage-related tail risk. "Citi's mortgage servicing portfolio is about one-quarter the size of Bank of America's, so the headaches surrounding servicing issues are a much smaller thorn in Citi's side. In addition, the two banks' rep and warranty risks are meaningfully different, with Bank of America's outstanding repurchase claims totaling about 11x the amount of Citi's claims pipeline." He also notes that Citi will likely pay less in any State AG foreclosure settlement, given its lower mortgage exposure.Three, Citi has a lower consumer banking presence in the U.S. relative to Bank of America and would be less affected by regulations affecting consumer banking such as new overdraft rules and the Durbin Amendment that restricts fees charged by banks to merchants for debit card transactions.Finally, Citi has greater exposure to faster-growing emerging markets, with 60% of net revenue coming from outside the U.S., compared to 20% in the case of Bank of America. But its exposure to the troubled European nations is not any more than Bank of America.

This post originally appeared on The Street.

Please follow Clusterstock on Twitter and Facebook.

x

To embed this post, copy the code below and paste into your website or blog.


View the original article here


This post was made using the Auto Blogging Software from WebMagnates.org This line will not appear when posts are made after activating the software to full version.

Don't Look Now, But Bank Of America Is Up 9% (BAC)

  x You have successfully emailed the post. Please follow Clusterstock on Twitter and Facebook.
Follow Gus Lubin on Twitter.
Ask Gus A Question >

x

To embed this post, copy the code below and paste into your website or blog.


View the original article here


This post was made using the Auto Blogging Software from WebMagnates.org This line will not appear when posts are made after activating the software to full version.

Tuesday, August 23, 2011

There Is A Rumor That JP Morgan May Take Over Bank Of America

  x You have successfully emailed the post.

There is a rumor circulated on Wall St. that JP Morgan (NYSE: JPM) will take over Bank of America (NYSE: BAC) within the week. The government will support the deal with a $100 billion investment in preferred shares issued by the combined entity. Alternatively, the government may guarantee the value of a large pool of Bank of America assets. The word is that Treasury Secretary Geithner has discussed the transaction with JP Morgan CEO Jamie Dimon.The “merger” would completely destroy the value of BAC’s common shares.

The government feels that the deal may be necessary as Bank of America struggles unsuccessfully to close several transactions to bolster its balance sheet. The Wall Street Journal reported that the financial firm will need to raise $200 billion which would be another possible event that would wipe out common shareholders.

Bank of America’s fortunes have been hurt by events in just the last few days. A New York State judge agreed to allow institutional investors to intervene in an $8.5 billion settlement between the bank and groups that lost money on mortgage-backed securities. China Construction Bank Corp said Bank of American will continue to hold 50% of its share in the foreign financial firm. Many investors hoped Bank of America would sell its entire stake to raise money. Several analysts believe that the costs of owning mortgage firm Countrywide Credit have grown unexpectedly large.

Please follow Clusterstock on Twitter and Facebook.

x

To embed this post, copy the code below and paste into your website or blog.


View the original article here


This post was made using the Auto Blogging Software from WebMagnates.org This line will not appear when posts are made after activating the software to full version.